Share this
The Key to Gas Analyzer Calibration Procedure Effectiveness
by Morgan Zealear on 9/3/20 8:45 AM
Most new gas analyzer sampling systems are complicated and expensive—but increasingly necessary. Strict Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) regulations recently include updated fenceline monitoring requirements. While this can be done with old-fashion spot sampling, often it makes sense for Bay Area refineries to switch to a gas analyzer system because of the time lock requirements.
Once they are installed, however, gas analyzer systems need a lot more calibration work than other sampling methods. Whether the gas analyzer calibration procedure is done at the grab sample panel, the analyzer, or somewhere in between, the most important element of getting a good representative sample over to the analyzer is the arrangement of tubing, panel and valve placement, and valve manifold design.
Understanding the specific requirements of your process and unit space can help you achieve the most effective calibration system design. Of course, you might find the need to reach out for the help of a Design/Build partner. Here’s why.
Sampling System Design Goals and How to Meet Them
There are three main tasks gas analyzer sampling systems need to accomplish. Just as with any sample system, they need to take a good representative sample, transfer that sample to the analyzer, and support any analyzer calibration requirements. Let’s take a look at each one of these to understand how the design can give you an advantage.
Taking a representative sample and getting it to the analyzer
Once a good sample point is identified, taking a representative sample is straightforward. But, depending on where the analyzer needs to be located, getting the sample to the analyzer can often take a sample pump to move enough sample volume quickly enough for a useful measurement.
In some older Bay Area refineries, however, ensuring that all the required system components fit can be more than just a Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) challenge because of the space constraints in retrofitted units. Sometimes the analyzer must be placed far away from the sample point so you need a sample pump—and expert design assistance. To ensure that you have the right equipment installed correctly for taking a good representative sample, it makes sense to get a consultation with a Design/Build partner who can customize a solution.
Supporting calibration requirements
Planning for a system that supports gas analyzer calibration procedures is too often overlooked until late in the gas analyzer system design process. Modern gas analyzers typically require regular checks and calibration. Often check gasses from the cylinders may need to be run through an analyzer as frequently as once a day. Doing this requires a manifold that allows the sample point to be isolated and the check gas cylinder to provide gas to the analyzer.
Similarly, monthly or quarterly analyzers typically require a calibration that is run on a range of gasses of known composition. Calibration manifolds for this procedure can be extensive. The more complex your sampling system needs are, the more important it is to find design support.
Note: Always consult with the analyzer manufacturer to confirm when check and calibration runs need to be done. The various Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and BAAQMD rules typically require quarterly calibrations, but some manufacturers recommend more them frequently. |
The Benefits of an Automated Gas Analyzer Calibration Procedure System
Many calibrations can be automated so that daily checks and even the more extensive calibration runs can be automatically completed by the Distributed Control System (DCS). Implementing automation provides several convincing benefits, especially when you do a cost/ savings analysis. Let’s run through some of them.
- Significant time savings for operations and maintenance teams. When an analyzer’s measured value changes significantly, for instance, it can trigger alarms. If the DCS system knows it is performing a check or calibration, then it can also turn off those spurious alarms.
- Improved record keeping since the test records are automatically recorded in the DCS and thus available to any refinery personnel who need them. Typically, that means the Environmental Department can see that the required calibrations are complete in real-time.
- Reduced field labor as valves are automatically opened and closed with the DCS recording testing results. This saves operational hours.
While the extra automation can add to project costs, for compliance-critical gas analyzers, it can also deliver peace of mind to know that regulator required actions are indeed happening and being recorded automatically. But you should reach out to a sampling system vendor to understand the full range of options and the budgetary benefits of a new or updated system.
The right sample station vendor for ensuring an effective gas analyzer calibration procedure should also be a solid Design/Build partner. Their expertise can help you get the right manifold to handle all of the calibration processes as well as automatic valves to simplify some of it.
Choosing the Right Sample System Vendor is the Key
With a team of expert engineers and fabricators located right here in the California Bay Area, Swagelok is uniquely positioned to help with all your sampling needs. We can do an on-site visit to understand any space constraints then locally design and fabricate sampling systems and manifolds that meet your operational processes. As manifold and sample systems grow more complex and more common in Bay Area refineries, be assured that systems built by Swagelok are covered by the best Lifetime Warranty in the industry.
Swagelok Northern California can help with all of your sampling system and manifold needs from design through fabrication. Contact our team today by calling 510-933-6200.
Morgan Zealear | Product Engineer – Assembly Services
Morgan holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara. He is certified in Section IX, Grab Sample Panel Configuration, and Mechanical Efficiency Program Specification (API 682). He is also well-versed in B31.3 Process Piping Code. Before joining Swagelok Northern California, he was a Manufacturing Engineer at Sierra Instruments, primarily focused on capillary thermal meters for the semiconductor industry (ASML).
Share this
- Archive (465)
- Assembly Services (207)
- About (100)
- Seal Support Systems (96)
- Best Practices (88)
- Training Services (74)
- Fittings (51)
- Semiconductor Applications (49)
- Hoses and Flexible Tubing (47)
- Regulators (44)
- Tubing (42)
- Grab Sampling Systems (32)
- Sampling Systems (32)
- Gas Systems (30)
- Services (30)
- Downloads (29)
- Valves (24)
- Application Support (18)
- Orbital Welding (17)
- Case Studies (13)
- Steam Systems (13)
- Frequently Asked Questions (12)
- Tools (12)
- Measurement Devices (7)
- Subsystems (6)
- Thermal Management (6)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (4)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (6)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (8)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (6)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (6)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (6)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (8)
- August 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (8)
- May 2020 (6)
- April 2020 (9)
- March 2020 (7)
- February 2020 (10)
- January 2020 (21)
- December 2019 (23)
- November 2019 (21)
- October 2019 (22)
- September 2019 (21)
- August 2019 (22)
- July 2019 (23)
- June 2019 (20)
- May 2019 (23)
- April 2019 (22)
- March 2019 (21)
- February 2019 (20)
- January 2019 (21)
- December 2018 (14)
- November 2018 (19)
- October 2018 (23)
- September 2018 (17)
- August 2018 (29)
- July 2018 (11)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (3)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (3)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (11)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (8)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (6)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (6)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (4)