Top Gland Packing Seal Advantages and Disadvantages to Consider in Comparison to a Mechanical Seal

At some point in the life cycle of older pumps that still use gland packing seals to prevent, or, more accurately, limit process fluid leakage, you’ll look at the maintenance records and wonder if gland packing seals are still the best option. Would mechanical seals and seal support systems provide a better long-term solution? It’s really an exercise in weighing gland packing seal advantages and disadvantages on a pump by pump basis. 

There are multiple factors to consider in making that decision. Based on many years of working with California Bay Area refineries, I’ve seen all the ways that they can be weighed—and the effects of those decisions. Reliability issues in light of limited budgets and increasingly demanding Cal/OSHA and BAAQMD regulations are always top-of-mind lately. With those priorities at the forefront, I think you’ll see that mechanical seals offer some significant benefits compared to gland packing seals. 

Compare the Pros and Cons of Gland Packings vs Mechanical Seals 

Of course, the weight you put on each of these comparison categories will vary according to your immediate and long-term budget, local HSE requirements, technical considerations, space constraints, and integration with existing equipment. However, I think you'll see that in most circumstances, the benefits of gland packing seals are on the decline—especially as mechanical seal technology improves.

Let’s take a look at several categories of comparison when deciding about gland packing seal advantages and disadvantages: 

Purchase Cost

The initial costs of components and installation are a big lure for refineries to select gland packing seals, especially with many refinery budgets running on such thin margins right now. However, this is just one of the many considerations you should include in your cost/ benefit analysis. 

Installation Process

From the perspective of time and cost, gland packings have the advantage—faster installation because of comparatively simpler design. The skills and experience of maintenance personnel play an important role in deciding the better option as well, though.

Durability

There’s no question that a mechanical seal—when properly maintained by a seal support system—wins the durability category. Reliability and process engineers need to justify the upgrade to a seal support system, though.

Leakage

Depending on process conditions, loss of revenue-producing product, and safety or environmental concerns, the process engineer’s—and even the financial analyst’s—definition of acceptable leakage may be the factor that determines the gland packing vs. mechanical seal debate.

Ongoing Maintenance 

If you’re concerned about reducing maintenance costs associated with the frequency of inspections and replacements, then mechanical seals and seal support systems require a greater up-front investment but reduce maintenance demands in the long run.

Energy Usage

There’s a clear, measurable advantage offered by mechanical seals: they are far more energy-efficient. If you have dozens to hundreds of pumps using gland packing seals, an upgrade to mechanical seals and seal support systems will deliver long-term energy savings, especially with high utility costs in California. 

Operational Costs

Energy and maintenance are the main factors here. Some mechanical seal support plans may have on-going supply costs that are canceled out by energy savings. In the long run, mechanical seals may pencil out to be the most cost-effective.

Environmental Risk

For refineries operating under Cal/OSHA or BAAQMD regulations, any leakage that brings environmental risks requires immediate attention. When environmental factors weigh heavily in your decision, mechanical seals and seal support systems offer peace of mind.

Two other factors to consider with regard to gland packing seal advantages and disadvantages: bearing damage and lost product due to leakage. Depending on their proximity to the driveshaft bearings, even minute leakage over time could contaminate motor and shaft bearings. The result is significant costs tied to unplanned downtime and bearing replacements. The cost of repetitive equipment failures can quickly negate the initial advantage of gland packing seals’ lower installation and replacement costs. 

The other factor, leakage, is an inherent aspect of gland packing seals. In many instances, the leakage of process fluid, such as hydrocarbons, equates to lost revenue. 

Replacing a gland packing seal with a mechanical seal can result in long-term savings that more than repay the cost of the mechanical seal and seal support system installation.

The Switch to Mechanical Seals 

After you’ve applied the above criteria to your pumps and identified candidates where replacing gland packing seals disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In these cases, replacing them with mechanical seals and seal support systems makes sense. And you should seek the guidance of local mechanical seal and seal support stem vendors. Here’s why.

Mechanical seal vendors can advise you on the latest seal technology and variety of mechanical seal designs that best suit your specific processing needs. They’ll help you match the mechanical seal solution with the process fluid, temperature, pressure, and environmental conditions of each pump. This will eliminate the need for you to research the mechanical seal options and you’ll be assured of the best possible solutions for your specific needs.

Similarly, a local mechanical seal support vendor with substantial industry experience can advise you on the seal support system plans and configuration options available for each of the mechanical seals that are replacing gland packing seals. In comparison to mechanical seals, the range of seal support system options is far more complex. But an experienced mechanical seal vendor can explain why an API Plan 21 will provide longer seal life than API Plan 14, how good panel design and instrumentation reduce maintenance costs, or why API Plan 65B is the best solution to manage condensation of medium temperature fluids.

Swagelok has more than five decades of experience in helping petrochem refineries successfully make the transition from gland packing seals to mechanical seals and seal support systems. From initial on-site consultation and custom design of seal support systems to careful assembly and rigorous testing, Swagelok covers the full spectrum of mechanical seal support system services. 

To learn how Swagelok Northern California can help you obtain the best performance from mechanical seals that have replaced gland packaging seals, contact our team today by calling 510-933-6200.

About Paul Lesnau | Sales Manager, Business Development Manager, and Field Engineer

Paul holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from North Dakota State University. Before joining Swagelok Northern California, he was the West Coast Regional Sales Manager for an organization based in Illinois involved in pneumatic and hydraulic applications where he supervised product distribution throughout the western United States, Canada, and Mexico. While in this role, he was able to help provide technical and application-specific expertise to customers and distribution to drive specifications.