Share this
Why the API 682 Mechanical Seal Leak Test Procedure Isn’t Enough
by Paul Lesnau on 12/15/20 8:45 AM
A brand new mechanical seal provides a specific level of protection against pump leakage, but by itself, it can’t necessarily ensure the level of leak protection you need in your Northern California refinery. Here’s why: The API 682 Integrity Test is designed to identify mechanical seal manufacturing defects and assembly errors. This mechanical seal leak test procedure isn’t designed to simulate the seal’s actual performance under operating conditions, and the test certainly has its limitations.
Mechanical Seal Leak Test Procedure Limitations
One test is used regardless of seal design. It doesn’t differ according to seal arrangement, materials, face technology, size, or mating ring proportions. These and several other factors affect seal performance. Even though most mechanical seals effectively seal both air and liquids at low pressure, not all do. For example, high-pressure seals with low balance ratios satisfactorily seal liquids but leak air. Mechanical seals with polished faces have less air leakage in comparison to special (matte) face finishes. Contacting seals have less leakage than non-contacting seals. So one test doesn’t cover all bases.
The API 682 Integrity Test permits a maximum pressure drop of 0.14 bar (2 psig) over a five minute period from a maximum 28 liter (1cu ft) reservoir pressurized to 1.7 barg (25 psig). This represents a leakage rate of 56.9 g/hr of air, based on the ideal gas laws.
Refinery Needs Exceed the Mechanical Seal Leak Test Procedure Specs
For a Bay Area refinery concerned with fugitive emissions and possible sanctions from Cal/OSHA or BAAQMD, that leakage rate is unacceptable. So, even though the API 682 Integrity Test can catch manufacturing defects, you’re not guaranteed leak-free performance. That’s where mechanical seal support systems bridge the gap between the mechanical seal leak test procedure limitations and a refinery’s stringent requirements.
Proper Seal Support System Configuration Is Critical
A seal support system properly configured for your mechanical seal and pumping process helps minimize the chance of pump leakage. There are near-infinite combinations of pumping conditions, mechanical seals, and seal support systems. To help navigate this complexity of options, I recommend seeking the guidance of an experienced seal support system supplier. They’ll work with you to assess the specific requirements of each pump, mechanical seal, and process conditions. Based on the assessment, they’ll recommend the mechanical seal support system plan and configuration to help ensure you comply with Cal/OSHA and BAAQMD regulations and extend the mechanical seal’s life.
Proper configuration tailors the seal support system to the specific temperature, pressure, and process fluid conditions of the pumping process. Components are selected to help ensure the optimum operating environment for each mechanical seal.
Managing Temperature
- Coolers or heat exchangers rated to maintain process or flush fluid at a temperature to sufficiently remove heat from seal faces and prevent thermal distortion of seal faces that inevitably result in leakage
- Thermometer and temperature transmitter to measure temperature and proactively alert to excessive temperature variations that could be problematic
Managing Pressure
- Barrier fluids pressurize by nitrogen, bladder accumulator, piston accumulator, or an external pump to maintain the correct between-seal pressure for dual/tandem seal arrangement
- Valves, pressure gauges, and pressure transmitters to monitor pressure and alert to variations that could lead to unacceptable leakage across inboard and outboard seal faces
Process Fluid Conditions
- Strainers or cyclone separators to remove particulates from process fluids to prevent damage to seal faces
- Water or steam flush to the atmospheric seal side to prevent crystallization or coking of high-temp hydrocarbons on the seal
A well-configured echanical seal support system begins with matching the proper seal support plan to the mechanical seal type and then refines the plan with components tailored to the specific pumping conditions.
Don’t Forget: Design For Accessibility And Maintenance
A properly configured mechanical seal support system will incorporate the components and function to maximize pump reliability. That configuration should also provide easy accessibility by operations and maintenance personnel.
With hundreds to thousands of centrifugal pumps in your refinery, best practices in panel design, tubing geometry, and location of vents and gauges facilitate efficient visual inspection and maintenance. Good design reduces inspection time. Good design reduces maintenance time. Good design is as important as proper configuration in helping refineries maintain pump reliability and avoid leakage that incurs regulatory sanctions.
Swagelok: Helping Refineries Minimize Mechanical Seal Leaks
For more than 50 years Swagelok has been working with refineries in Northern California. Our expert Field Engineers are available to consult on-site to assess your requirements and recommend solutions tailored to your specific pumping needs. Swagelok’s petroleum industry experience, highest-quality components, and assembly services enable us to design, fabricate, and test (following ISO 9001 quality standards) mechanical seal support systems to help minimize mechanical seal leaks and meet stringent California environmental standards.
To find out more about how Swagelok Northern California can help you select the right API plan for dry gas seals for your specific process needs, contact our team today by calling 510-933-6200.
About Paul Lesnau | Sales Manager, Business Development Manager, and Field Engineer
Paul holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from North Dakota State University. Before joining Swagelok Northern California, he was the West Coast Regional Sales Manager for an organization focused within the pneumatic and hydraulic industry where he supervised product distribution throughout the western United States, Canada, and Mexico. While in this role, he was able to help provide technical and application-specific expertise to customers and distribution to drive specifications.
Share this
- Archive (465)
- Assembly Services (207)
- About (100)
- Seal Support Systems (96)
- Best Practices (88)
- Training Services (74)
- Fittings (51)
- Semiconductor Applications (49)
- Hoses and Flexible Tubing (47)
- Regulators (44)
- Tubing (42)
- Grab Sampling Systems (32)
- Sampling Systems (32)
- Gas Systems (30)
- Services (30)
- Downloads (29)
- Valves (24)
- Application Support (18)
- Orbital Welding (17)
- Case Studies (13)
- Steam Systems (13)
- Frequently Asked Questions (12)
- Tools (12)
- Measurement Devices (7)
- Subsystems (6)
- Thermal Management (6)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (4)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (6)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (8)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (6)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (6)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (6)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (8)
- August 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (8)
- May 2020 (6)
- April 2020 (9)
- March 2020 (7)
- February 2020 (10)
- January 2020 (21)
- December 2019 (23)
- November 2019 (21)
- October 2019 (22)
- September 2019 (21)
- August 2019 (22)
- July 2019 (23)
- June 2019 (20)
- May 2019 (23)
- April 2019 (22)
- March 2019 (21)
- February 2019 (20)
- January 2019 (21)
- December 2018 (14)
- November 2018 (19)
- October 2018 (23)
- September 2018 (17)
- August 2018 (29)
- July 2018 (11)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (3)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (3)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (11)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (8)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (6)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (6)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (4)