Share this
Choosing a Refinery Gas Analyzer: Top 5 Considerations for Making the Right Decision
by Morgan Zealear on 5/25/21 9:00 AM
Choosing refinery gas analyzers and sampling systems are critical for enabling refineries to monitor gases produced during crude oil refining—such as stack emissions, flare emissions, reformative streams, and hydrotreatment streams. For stack and flare emissions, it is imperative to obtain representative samples of the emissions in order to comply with regulatory authorities, such as the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). For reformative streams and hydrotreatment streams, the purity of the hydrogen must be measured to calculate accurate rates of conversion from the reactor. This is also important for process quality control and process accuracy relative to managing operational expenses within refineries.
Most refinery gas analyzers work on the principle of gas chromatography. This entails separating components in a mixture through the variation in partitioning behavior between mobile and stationary phases. The differences in structure and properties of each component result in the components moving out of the column in different orders, allowing for the gas composition to be characterized.
As an exact measurement of refinery gases is essential for optimizing refinery processes and controlling product quality, there are quite a few considerations for making the right decision.
Considerations for a Refinery Gas Analyzer
When choosing a refinery gas analyzer, there are a number of criteria to consider to ensure regulatory and process quality requirements are met. The first step is to narrow down analyzer options based on what part of the refining process the analyzer is going to be integrated with. There are three fundamental criteria to consider: speed of analysis, accuracy and reliability, and finding the right sampling system to integrate with the analyzer. Ease of calibration and ergonomics should also be considered but are less of a priority.
Measurement Type
While refinery gas streams vary considerably in composition, there are common components to look for in each use case. If the analyzer is to be integrated for purposes of measuring stack and flare emissions, the analyzer must be able to characterize the following: C1 through nC6 paraffins, C6+ hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulfide, and inert gases (hydrogen, nitrogen, helium, oxygen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide).
Speed of Analysis
While gas chromatography is an inherently quick method to characterize gas, some refinery gas analyzers are quicker than others. Knowing a process chemistry in minutes versus hours or even days later makes all the difference in refinery operations. For stack and flare emissions, it is important to obtain results from the analyzer in a matter of minutes, as the heating value of the stack or flare can change rapidly. A quick response is necessary to prevent potentially hazardous conditions for personnel and to meet emissions regulations.
Accuracy and Reliability
Refinery gas analyzer accuracy and reliability play heavily into a refinery’s ability to make quick decisions regarding the process and avoid disruptions due to environmental impact. Accurate actionable data is necessary to allow engineers to make informed decisions to adjust process conditions accordingly. If an analyzer is unreliable and stops working, this can halt the entire process until emission measurements can be taken.
Calibration and Ergonomics
Once a refinery gas analyzer has been selected, it is time to consider the logistics of implementation. This entails deciding where and how the analyzer will fit into the process, whether that be in a shed or a more robust design by a local vendor.
Refinery gas analyzers typically have two types of necessary calibration: daily or weekly checks and periodic calibration. Daily or weekly checks may include a single-point calibration with a known gas that is being measured, such as hydrogen sulfide. Initial and periodic calibration may involve a three-point (high, middle, and low) calibration with three to four gases. These checks and/or calibrations can either be done manually or can be automated to save time, improve record-keeping, and reduce field labor.
The Final and Most Important Consideration: Finding the Best Sampling System for Your Analyzer
Finding the best refinery gas analyzer is critical for everyday refinery operations. However, it is just as important, if not more, to find a sampling system to work with the analyzer. The ability to comply with local regulations with regards to gas emissions is highly dependent on the combination of a refinery gas analyzer with a high-quality sampling system. The sampling system can make or break analyzer speed and reliability. When running an analyzer, an adequate amount of time is needed to purge the sample lines to allow for a representative sample to be taken. Without a speedy and reliable sampling system, the analyzer will not be able to provide accurate and representative data.
If you are uncertain about how to match the right sampling system with a refinery gas analyzer, Field Engineers at Swagelok Northern California are available to provide expert advice on gas analyzer sampling systems in refineries. Swagelok Field Engineers will perform an on-site review of your process and analyzer to help you choose a reliable sampling system tailored to your specific sampling needs.
To find out more about how Swagelok Northern California can help you find the right sampling system for your refinery gas analyzer, contact our team today by calling 510-933-6200.
Morgan Zealear | Product Engineer – Assembly Services
Morgan holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara. He is certified in Section IX, Grab Sample Panel Configuration, and Mechanical Efficiency Program Specification (API 682). He is also well-versed in B31.3 Process Piping Code. Before joining Swagelok Northern California, he was a Manufacturing Engineer at Sierra Instruments, primarily focused on capillary thermal meters for the semiconductor industry (ASML).
Share this
- Archive (465)
- Assembly Services (207)
- About (100)
- Seal Support Systems (96)
- Best Practices (88)
- Training Services (74)
- Fittings (51)
- Semiconductor Applications (49)
- Hoses and Flexible Tubing (47)
- Regulators (44)
- Tubing (42)
- Grab Sampling Systems (32)
- Sampling Systems (32)
- Gas Systems (30)
- Services (30)
- Downloads (29)
- Valves (24)
- Application Support (18)
- Orbital Welding (17)
- Case Studies (13)
- Steam Systems (13)
- Frequently Asked Questions (12)
- Tools (12)
- Measurement Devices (7)
- Subsystems (6)
- Thermal Management (6)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (4)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (6)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (8)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (6)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (6)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (6)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (8)
- August 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (8)
- May 2020 (6)
- April 2020 (9)
- March 2020 (7)
- February 2020 (10)
- January 2020 (21)
- December 2019 (23)
- November 2019 (21)
- October 2019 (22)
- September 2019 (21)
- August 2019 (22)
- July 2019 (23)
- June 2019 (20)
- May 2019 (23)
- April 2019 (22)
- March 2019 (21)
- February 2019 (20)
- January 2019 (21)
- December 2018 (14)
- November 2018 (19)
- October 2018 (23)
- September 2018 (17)
- August 2018 (29)
- July 2018 (11)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (3)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (3)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (11)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (8)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (6)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (6)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (4)