Share this
If Your Grab Sampling Procedure Produces Inconsistent Results in Northern California—Do This
by Morgan Zealear on 6/15/21 12:00 PM
From the sample point to the analyzer, there is a number of problems that can contribute to inconsistent sampling results. In my three years of working with process engineers at Northern California refineries, I’ve helped with hundreds of grab sampling issues, identifying the root cause of the problem, then recommending the best solutions. Best practices in any refinery include standardization of sampling procedures and equipment.
However, the reality of working in refineries that have been operating for decades, is that it’s nearly impossible to achieve complete standardization. So when your grab sampling procedures are producing inconsistent results, I recommend the following steps to find and remedy the problem.
Start at the Sampling Point
A malfunctioning sample probe could be the root cause of the problem. Viscous fluids, particulates in process fluids, and temperature changes can impede the flow of a truly representative sample. A broken sample probe taking fluid from the periphery of the pipe, not the middle of the stream, can lead to pipe corrosion contaminating the sample. If it’s been some time since you inspected the sample point, start there to ensure the probe is in good condition and working properly.
Look for Problems in the Transport Line
A transport line of any significant length (from sample point to sampling panel) can also be the cause of a problem. Leaks, crimps, dead legs can all diminish the sample consistency. Conditioning equipment such as coolers or electric/steam traces used in the sample transport line to deliver sample fluid in the right condition to the sample panel may be failing. A failing or failed cooler could be delivering fluid at a higher temperature and pressure to the sampling cylinder. A failed electric/steam trace may be causing sample fluid to congeal and result in an insufficient sample volume in a cylinder. Worn or deteriorating insulation on the transport line can also be the cause of poor quality samples. In each case, the sample conditions may not allow accurate analysis by the analyzer.
Assess Panel Design for Grab Sampling Procedure Consistency
If all components from sample tap to sample panel are operating properly, you can still obtain inconsistent results with a poorly designed sampling panel. In some of the worst cases I’ve seen, there isn’t even a panel. Sampling was done via passed-down knowledge of the technique, written notes for the sequence for opening and closing valves, and acquired skills in capturing proper sample volume.
You’ll improve sampling consistency with a panel that is designed for the specific sampling process. Good design that promotes consistent grab sampling procedures incorporates the following features:
- Clearly printed instructions located on the panel
- Accurate lag time calculation to ensure stagnant fluid in the transport line is replaced with fresh process fluid
- Intuitive panel layout indicates the sampling sequence to the operator
- Geared valve assemblies ensure valves required to collect a sample are being opened in the correct sequence
- When required, a purge process using a geared valve assembly ensures purge fluids are not reintroduced into the main process by human error
Refineries have a myriad of grab sampling locations. When grab sampling stations are upgraded or replaced, you have an opportunity to standardize the grab sampling panel. And although there will be variations among the panels, depending on the sampling need, a standardized grab sampling panel will bring a level of consistency to grab sampling procedures throughout the refinery.
Don’t Jeopardize Sample Quality With Cylinder Transport Problems
If you’re transporting sample cylinders any distance from the sample panel to the analyzer, especially if there are possible delays in transport, that too can affect sample quality and consistency. Do sample cylinders need to be maintained at certain temperatures? Are there well-understood written procedures that explain the proper methods for transporting samples? How experienced are the personnel responsible for transporting the samples. Even when your grab sampling systems are operating consistently, poor sample transportation practices can undermine accurate analysis.
Seek Local Expertise for Grab Sampling Procedure Consistency
Swagelok Field Engineers have been working with process and quality control engineers in Northern California refineries to achieve grab sampling procedures that produce truly representative samples. We’ve helped troubleshoot and solve problems with aging sampling systems, as well as recommend upgrades to improve the efficiency of frequent sampling activities.
Our Field Engineers bring a wealth of experience to design systems tailored to the unique requirements of each sampling process. With facilities in Fremont and Concord we’re ideally located to support Northern California Refineries with a wide range of fluid systems engineering needs, on-site, by phone, and virtually.
To find out more about how Swagelok Northern California can help you achieve consistency in your grab sampling procedures by providing expert consultation and Assembly Services, contact our team today by calling 510-933-6200.
Morgan Zealear | Product Engineer – Assembly Services
Morgan holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara. He is certified in Section IX, Grab Sample Panel Configuration, and Mechanical Efficiency Program Specification (API 682). He is also well-versed in B31.3 Process Piping Code. Before joining Swagelok Northern California, he was a Manufacturing Engineer at Sierra Instruments, primarily focused on capillary thermal meters for the semiconductor industry (ASML).
Share this
- Archive (465)
- Assembly Services (207)
- About (100)
- Seal Support Systems (96)
- Best Practices (88)
- Training Services (74)
- Fittings (51)
- Semiconductor Applications (49)
- Hoses and Flexible Tubing (47)
- Regulators (44)
- Tubing (42)
- Grab Sampling Systems (32)
- Sampling Systems (32)
- Gas Systems (30)
- Services (30)
- Downloads (29)
- Valves (24)
- Application Support (18)
- Orbital Welding (17)
- Case Studies (13)
- Steam Systems (13)
- Frequently Asked Questions (12)
- Tools (12)
- Measurement Devices (7)
- Subsystems (6)
- Thermal Management (6)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (4)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (6)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (8)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (6)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (6)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (6)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (8)
- August 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (8)
- May 2020 (6)
- April 2020 (9)
- March 2020 (7)
- February 2020 (10)
- January 2020 (21)
- December 2019 (23)
- November 2019 (21)
- October 2019 (22)
- September 2019 (21)
- August 2019 (22)
- July 2019 (23)
- June 2019 (20)
- May 2019 (23)
- April 2019 (22)
- March 2019 (21)
- February 2019 (20)
- January 2019 (21)
- December 2018 (14)
- November 2018 (19)
- October 2018 (23)
- September 2018 (17)
- August 2018 (29)
- July 2018 (11)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (3)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (3)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (11)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (8)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (6)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (6)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (4)